Topic 4: Design for online and blended learning

-
This is where the course is beginning to make real sense to me. I have developed and taught online courses since 2011 and have had to learn through trial and mistakes what works and what does not. Approaching the guidelines offered by City University London through the lens of Salmon's (2013) five-step model for successful online learning confirms what I already knew - but more importantly taught me a lot of what I did not. Something else I am increasingly becoming aware of is how important it is that colleagues and the institution as a whole are onboard with what one is trying to achieve. This is not always the case, I have found, and then it does not matter how good one's intentions are. The battle is too uphill. 

Nevertheless, here a quick summary of some of the things I thought about while reading the material for this week: The initial stage feels very familiar -make sure that the course is accessible, create a friendly welcoming environment, clarify netiquette etc. Step two - here there is room for improvement in my courses. typically I begin with small individual assignments, but a more collaborative assignment might actually be a better option, to break the ice. Step 3 - this is where the course proper begins. Students are expected to work together, if only ata very basic level, by answering and commenting on set questions. Perhaps I need to play a more active role in this process. Step 4 - I am not sure this step even exists in my current courses, which is a bit depressing from the perspective of all that I have learnt during this course. I will need to rethink the entire structure of my course in order to achieve this level. Step 5 - Ok, so this is where we (teacher - students) part ways. This is where students go off on their own, hopefully taking what they have learnt with them.

One way to motivate colleagues and not the least one's institution is to emphasize student retention. Online course drop-out is notoriously common, after all. van Ameij et al. (2018) suggest a number of solutions: the different parts of a course must be well-integrated, Student collaboration must form part of the course, activities and material must be engaging, the workload must be balanced, material should be limited to the learning outcomes, the course should include reflective elements, such as self-assessments and finally, the course should be structured in such as way that students work towards more complex tasks gradually. 



References:

City University London (2016). Online Facilitation Techniques. Retrieved from: https://sleguidance.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/BL/pages/36962474/Online+facilitation+techniques#app-switcher

Salmon, G.  (2013). The Five-stage Model. Retrieved from: https://www.gillysalmon.com/five-stage-model.html




  • Reflect on your current practice and reason about possibilities for development of online and blended learning designs.
  • Reflect on how you can provide support, facilitation and scaffolding for students in online and blended learning environments.
  • Are there opportunities for further development in this area, that you have identified as a result of your own experience as a learner in the ONL course and of your engagement in this topic?

Comments

  1. UnknownDecember 3, 2018 at 12:51 AM

    Really great to apply the five stages to your own courses - and to use them to evaluate the potential for development in them! Looking forward to hear what you try out and how it goes :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction, week 1

-
1. Getting Started I am way behind in my reading for this course, so writing anything on this blog has not made sense until now. Since I still have some catching up to do, in this entry, I will just comment and reflect on the texts and videos that appeared in the first few weeks of the course.   To begin with, I am not really sure what I have signed up for. This does not worry me too much, per se. Studies of students with advanced reading skills, for example, show that students who read a lot do not worry when a texts does not immediately make sense. Instead, they trust that they will eventually figure it out. In other words, they trust their own ability to make sense out of chaos and they trust that the chaos is illusory. Experience tells them it will probably be ok. So that is where I am. In the chaos, trusting that things will eventually begin to make sense.  But I am apprehensive. Reading the suggested blogposts by Kay Oddone I find myself increasingly qu...
Read more

Introduction, week 2

-
2. Connecting After getting some of the apprehensions and general scepticism off my chest, I feel ready to approach this course with a more open mind. And it is encouraging that the question I asked in my first post is (somewhat) addressed in the reading material for this week. Davidson and Howell Major's (2014) article on group learning seems like a good starting-point. The two authors distinguish among three types of group learning. As the title of their article suggests, these are coöperative learning, collaborative learning, team-based learning and problem-based learning. All four approaches are constructivist in nature, but to different degrees, it seems. The coöoperative approach is the one I am best familiar with from before and have used in my own classrooms. What I like about this kind of group work is that I still have some control over what my students learn (p. 14). When students work together in groups, typically with study questions, they sometimes move superfi...
Read more